WindMill Media Pressline

Blog

Luria to face Democratic challengers before a potential rematch with Kiggans in 2nd District

By Charlotte Rene Woods
Virginia Mercury

In Virginia's 2nd Congressional District, four Democrats are vying for the chance to unseat Republican incumbent Jennifer Kiggans. The Virginia Democratic primary is Aug. 4. (Photo by Ross Williams/Georgia Recorder)

This summer, four Democratic candidates will face off in a primary for the chance to oust incumbent Republican representative Jen Kiggans in Virginia’s 2nd Congressional District.

The Virginia Beach-anchored district is politically purple and often oscillates between partisan control, though in past years it had a decidedly Republican lean.

Its nearly 600,000 residents backed Gov. Abigail Spanberger last year by 53% and analysts consider it flippable — making it a key contest that could help determine partisan control of Congress.

All four Democratic primary candidates — which include the district’s former representative Elaine Luria, acute care doctor Nila Devanath, former USAID worker Patrick Mosolf and regional government official Bill Fleming — seek to hold Kiggans “accountable” and help congress provide a check and balance to the “corruption” of President Donald Trump.

Who’s who

Kiggans, a Navy veteran and nurse practitioner, has represented the district for two terms after ousting Luria, who also represented it for two terms. With no primary challenger, she did not do an interview for this story, but she did respond to questions by email.

With Navy veteran Luria formerly representing the district, she already has backing from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee along with Democratic leadership in Virginia including Gov. Abigail Spanberger and Sen. Louise Lucas, D-Portsmouth.

During her time in Congress Luria backed the creation of the Affordable Care Act’s Enhanced Premium Tax Credits — which have since expired but helped reach more people struggling to afford healthcare. She also backed the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, a range of energy efficiency and healthcare affordability measures.

Devanath,the daughter of Bangladesh immigrants, is an acute care doctor but previously worked as a lawyer at a legal clinic defending domestic violence survivors.

If elected, she plans to bring her legal and medical insights to Congress. She has already made trips to D.C. to meet with members of finance committees, she said, to prepare for how she can help address economic issues if she earns a seat on Capitol Hill.

Virginia Beach Soil and Water Conservation District director Bill Fleming hopes to join the U.S. House Committee on Agriculture if elected so that he can help advance environmental laws. He shares many progressive policy priorities with some of his primary opponents but considers himself an “independent democrat.”

From serving as director of a homeless shelter to time spent working for USAID, Mosolf said his time spent solving problems has helped him prepare to take that work to the nation’s legislative body. He was motivated to run and find new routes to solve problems after losing his job to Trump’s closure of USAID.

Addressing the cost of living

The rising cost of living, from groceries to housing to healthcare, is a motivating factor for Kiggans and all four Democratic candidates.

Each candidate criticized Kiggans’ support for Trump’s tariffs, war with Iran, and a reconciliation bill that entails changes to Medicaid and hospital funding mechanisms. They also pointed out Kiggans’ vote to not renew expired Affordable Care Act subsidies.

Luria said Kiggans expressed interest in bipartisan collaboration after ousting Luria from the seat in 2022, a stance she said was in contrast with Kiggans’ votes in favor of Trump policies.

Ahead of the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act last summer, Kiggans joined an open letter in opposition to aspects of the bill she ultimately voted for.

Kiggans was previously outspoken about the need to renew expiring ACA tax credits, Luria said, even writing a letter in support of extending the credits, but ultimately changed her tune.

Virginia Congressman Wittman among just 17 Republicans nationally to back ACA credits extension

“Writing a letter that is in opposition to something you’re voting for — it just doesn’t work that way,” Luria said.

In an email, Kiggans said her initial support of renewing the credits was conditional on “meaningful reforms” to strengthen protections against “waste fraud and abuse.”

All Democratic challengers said addressing affordability issues will be a priority for them, if elected.

“I think it’s going to take a lot of small things. It’s not just pushing a magic button,” Mosolf said.

All the Democratic contenders said they would work to extend the ACA subsidies and undo the healthcare provisions of the reconciliation bill.

They are supportive of a massive bipartisan housing bill that is nearing Trump’s desk and could see his signature; if it doesn’t, though, they said they will try again.

On healthcare, Devanath and Fleming are backing a growing Democratic embrace of universal healthcare. The idea is to replace private insurance companies with government-run insurance available to everyone.

Because uninsured and underinsured people are more likely to put off primary care, Devanath said she’s increasingly treating people in critical condition or for whom more drastic measures could have been prevented.

This is why she’ll back the Medicare For All Act, she said.

“You have to have people who are willing to be bold,” Devanath said. “Instead of following incremental change, let’s go for the gold. Put it out there, stick to it, and see where we land.”

Devanath and Fleming also support the Working Americans’ Tax Cut Act, which would create a tiered surtax on income over a million dollars.

“It’s one thing to sit and grumble about something while you’re watching television, but it’s better to try to get a seat at the table, so that you can maybe affect change,” Fleming said.

Stock trading crackdown, campaign finance reform

Luria said Congress should hold itself accountable by banning stock trading of elected officials, pointing to what she called a “long list” of ways Trump has capitalized on his presidency to financially benefit his family or allies.

As a congresswoman, Gov. Abigail Spanberger championed an effort to prevent lawmakers from capitalizing on sensitive information and disproportionately benefitting from their positions of power.

Luria was not always on board with the proposal, calling it “bullsh-t,” but her stance has evolved into support.

“Congress can set the example and actually walk the walk,” she said.

Kiggans is co-sponsor of a similar, more recent effort.

Wittman seeks to keep 1st District seat, as Democratic challengers face crowded primary

All of the Democratic contenders want to address how candidates receive donations for their campaigns by reigning in large political action committees’ donations along with “dark money” contributions, large entities’ donations that are not publicly disclosed.

Luria’s Democratic challengers have taken issue with her updated stance on campaign finance. In 2018, she’d signed a pledge to not take corporate money before accepting $34,000 from corporate PACs in 2020.

Luria’s donors have included the Democratic Majority for Israel PAC and some of her donors have also contributed to American Israel Public Affairs Committee. After a United Nations committee concluded that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, Luria’s challengers said it would be unethical for them to take money from groups that support Israel. (Israeli officials have denounced the report as “distorted and false,” according to NPR.)

While AIPAC has historically supported both parties so long as candidates are “pro-Israel,” the group’s supporthas emerged as a rift among some Democratic candidates in recent election cycles.

Kiggans, who has also been boosted by AIPAC, has supported U.S. involvement in Israel’s affairs. In 2024 she voted for military aid to Israel in a package of bills she said were “not perfect,” but needed at the time.

Kiggans defends record, discusses future

Kiggans recently reaffirmed that she “couldn’t be a stauncher supporter” of Trump and U.S. military actions against Iran.

The conflict, initiated by America, has contributed to spiking gas prices because Iran is a critical global player in oil trades.

“When the Iran conflict is over, gas prices will come down and we’ll work to get them even lower with American energy dominance,” Kiggans said.

While Democrats have lambasted Kiggans for voting for the Big Beautiful Bill, she emphasized that the measure also “cut taxes on social security, tips and overtime” to “put more money in the pockets of Virginians.”

The two-term congresswoman has bucked Trump’s administration over a new rule that will exclude post-baccalaureate nursing degrees from a “professional degrees” list, joining a bipartisan letter in opposition.

Kiggans was also critical of the Trump administration’s efforts to stop construction of Dominion Energy’s offshore wind project, which is located in her district.

Still, her Democratic opponents said she has too often aligned with GOP majorities and the president, including her endorsement of federal workforce trimming despite the 2nd district having among the largest concentration of federal workers in the state.

“The bottom line is she has put Trump over the people of Hampton Roads,” Luria said. “People will hold her accountable at the ballot box in November.”

The Democratic hopefuls will face off for the chance to defeat Kiggans in the Democratic state primary election on Aug. 4.

Editor’s note: This story has been corrected to reflect that Luria has not received donations from AIPAC, as previously stated, but some of her donors have contributed to the organization.

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

SUPPORT

June 16, 2026
Amid budget battle, legislators pass the buck on concrete data center reforms. Again.

By Ivy Main
Virginia Mercury

The House of Delegates, pictured here on the final day of the 2026 legislative session, proposed a revamped budget stripped of environmental standards data centers would have had to meet to keep their sales and use tax exemption. (Photo by Markus Schmidt/Virginia Mercury)

Oh yay, another commission.

Leaders in the House of Delegates are continuing to tweak their version of a state budget, but they aren’t backing down from their fight with the Senate over data centers. What they are backing down from is their former insistence that data centers use clean energy. Instead, they propose to punt this and every other data center issue over to a commission.

Is that supposed to resolve the budget impasse? Because if that’s the idea, it sure seems like an odd way to go about it.

New House budget strips environmental standards for data centers, creates commission instead

Recall that Senate Finance Chair Louise Lucas, D-Portsmouth, wants to terminate the sales tax exemption that data centers have exploited to the tune of $1.6 billion lost from state coffers. (The total subsidy rises to $1.9 if you include the exemption from local taxes, but what’s a few hundred million bucks among friends?)

The tax isn’t something specific to data centers. It’s the same one all the rest of us pay. The argument that there are better ways to spend the money than to give it away to the world’s richest corporations has reaffirmed Lucas as a bonafide social media star at age 82, and she is enjoying it very much.

In response to the new House budget proposal, Lucas tweeted out a tweak of her own: She now proposes to subject data centers to a nearly-equivalent fee that would generate $1.7 billion in revenue. Lucas and allies have launched a “listening tour” to build support for her approach.

But the House budget does not eliminate the exemption, leaving the two sides at an impasse.

The House is set to reconvene on June 18, and the Senate on June 22. The chambers will attempt to resolve their differences and adopt a budget before July 1 to avoid a government shutdown.

House leaders argue that data center operators relied on this tax exemption when they chose to locate in Virginia. They signed memorandums of understanding agreeing to a few minor conditions, and in return they were promised they wouldn’t have to pay sales tax on computer chips and other equipment until 2035. (In the case of Amazon and any other corporation that sinks $50 billion into data centers in Virginia, the date has been extended out to 2045.)

But the House budget proposal originally incorporated provisions drawn from legislation introduced by Del. Rip Sullivan, D-Fairfax, requiring data centers that take advantage of the tax exemption to buy increasing percentages of renewable energy, refrain from using onsite fossil fuels as their primary energy source, and begin phasing out the backup diesel generators that threaten air quality. The bill passed the House but died in the Senate around the same time Lucas decided there shouldn’t be a tax exemption at all.

The disagreement left Virginia without a budget for the new year. Now suddenly the House has issued a new proposal that has the support of Gov. Abigail Spanberger. Instead of resolving the impasse, though, it actually goes backwards on regulating data centers.

It still leaves the tax exemption intact, but now “includes explicit direction for the establishment of a Commission to thoroughly evaluate the direct and indirect costs and benefits of the data center industry.” The commission is to issue a report and recommendations for legislative and budgetary changes, which the General Assembly will then consider next year.

Are you feeling a little prickle of déjà vu? That’s because we have seen this before, and not very long ago. In December 2023, the General Assembly headed off action for all of 2024 by directing the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission (JLARC) to assess the impact of the industry on energy demand, state revenue, natural resources – essentially, the same things this year’s commission is supposed to look at all over again.

You remember the JLARC report. It sounded a dire warning against the consequences of “unconstrained” data center demand. The report made a stir in December of 2024 when it was issued. Statements were released, proposals were floated.

And thus warned, the General Assembly went into the 2025 session and did . . . nothing.

Doing nothing pretty much described 2026 legislative action on data centers, as well. Among the few reforms House and Senate Democrats seemed to agree on were that data centers needed to buy renewable energy and storage to limit the increase in Virginia’s carbon emissions and to decrease the pollution from diesel generators. The House did this by way of Sullivan’s bill; the Senate supported a different approach. Each chamber killed the other’s bill.

That left the House budget as the only vehicle for progress this year on one of the central problems of the data center buildout. By backtracking now, House leaders and the governor show they are willing to capitulate entirely to the data center industry and its labor allies.

Workers, Speaker Scott criticize plan to axe data center tax exemption as budgets advance

To be sure, a budget amendment this year that puts conditions on tax exemptions in future years would need to be followed with new legislation to lock in the requirements. And for that purpose, House and Senate members should definitely work together this summer to align their proposals, ensuring both chambers agree on the terms of the legislation before it is introduced.

A commission with that task could be useful. After all, the Commission on Electric Utility Regulation, now rebranded as the Energy Commission of Virginia, succeeded in bringing together House and Senate members around a striking number of good energy bills this year.

But a commission that is thrown together suddenly and instructed to retrace the steps of a report issued barely 18 months ago seems suspiciously like a substitute for action.

This is all too familiar. When it comes to data centers, inaction seems to be the point.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

SUBSCRIBE

June 16, 2026
Local election officials reel over ‘logistical nightmare’ of Trump’s vote-by-mail order

By Jonathan Shorman
National

Election workers sort ballots at Contra Costa County's election operations facility on May 27, 2026 in Martinez, California. (Photo by Benjamin Fanjoy/Getty Images)

As election officials across the country steel themselves for the midterm elections in less than five months, President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting voting by mail threatens to upend their preparations.

The executive order instructs the U.S. Postal Service to refuse to deliver ballots in states that don’t provide lists of voters or meet other requirements. It has created a sense of deep uncertainty and concern among election officials as they consider how to comply, according to a review of court documents and interviews with election officials and experts on election administration.

The March 31 executive order, and a proposed Postal Service rule published June 2 that would put the order’s requirements into effect, raise serious logistical and procedural challenges for those running elections, they say. Rural areas with limited resources are especially at risk, but jurisdictions of all sizes could be forced to scramble.

The executive order is the latest step taken by Trump to assert control over state-run elections, along with the stalled SAVE America Act, which would require voters to provide documents proving their citizenship. The Justice Department, under Trump’s control, is also trying to obtain state voter rolls.

“This is just another death by a thousand cuts that clerks have been experiencing since the 2020 elections,” said Barb Byrum, the Democratic clerk of Ingham County, Michigan, which includes Lansing.

First-ever national voter list

The order and the rule require states to provide lists of mail-in voters if they want the Postal Service to deliver ballots, marking the first time the federal government has created a national voter list.

Mail ballot envelopes must meet certain design standards. And federal agencies have to compile lists of voting-age citizens to share with each state in an effort to root out noncitizen voters.

But Democratic states and voting rights groups argue the executive order — and the accompanying proposed rule — represent an illegal overreach by Trump because states administer elections under the U.S. Constitution. Trump and his Republican allies say the restrictions are necessary for election security and to combat noncitizen voting, which occurs extremely rarely.

The Postal Service didn’t respond to questions from States Newsroom. The agency has said the rule “will facilitate the faithful execution of federal law.”

Multiple lawsuits have been brought against the order, but a federal judge in Washington, D.C., in May declined to halt it, partly because the Trump administration hadn’t taken enough action to implement its requirements. Another federal judge in Massachusetts is weighing a separate request to block the order.

With the executive order still in effect, at least for now, election officials and experts who work with them are taking the ramifications of it and the proposed Postal Service rule seriously.

“We don’t have a national voter registration list. We don’t have, currently, a list of sanctioned, authorized voters to vote by mail at the federal level,” said Tammy Patrick, chief programs officer at Election Center, operated by the National Association of Election Officials. “That’s a big, big change in the way elections have always been conducted.”

Sweeping changes very quickly

In court papers filed in May, local election officials and local governments representing 26 jurisdictions across the country warned the executive order would “severely disrupt” local election administration and force the implementation of sweeping changes within months. Implementation of the order’s requirements will largely fall on local election officials, they argued.

Byrum was among the officials to sign onto the brief, along with others in Boston, and counties in Pennsylvania, Washington, Wisconsin and elsewhere.

Under the executive order, states that want to send ballots through the mail must provide the Postal Service with lists of voters they intend to provide a mail ballot. Local election officials will play a large role in helping states develop these lists, according to the court papers, and will have primary responsibility to help voters address any errors.

And Trump wants it all in place before November. The executive order’s proposed timelines “present a logistical nightmare for local election officials,” the officials warn.

“The general rule is don’t make changes before a big election because there’s always something you didn’t think about,” said Carolina Lopez, executive director of the Partnership for Large Election Jurisdictions, a nonpartisan organization for election officials in jurisdictions of at least 250,000 people.

The proposed Postal Service rule says the agency would launch a portal where states would submit voter lists and make updates. But a number of questions remain, said Lopez, who previously spent a decade administering elections in Miami-Dade County, Florida.

The portal poses the potential for bottlenecks in the election system and it’s unclear what would happen if it was ever offline. The United States has a decentralized election system, with states each running their own elections. By contrast, the Postal Service portal would create a single point of failure, raising concerns about the security of information on tens of millions of voters.

Additionally, while every state maintains a voter registration list, there is no nationwide standard for the formatting of that data. It’s unclear whether the portal will accept data in a variety of formats — the proposed rule only says the Postal Service wouldn’t alter the data provided by states.

“It looks a little different across the country and therefore normalizing the data will be a process,” Lopez said.

Struggle for small, rural counties

The Department of Justice initially said in a court document that the Department of Homeland Security planned to obtain voter data from the Postal Service before backpedaling a few days later. Still, Homeland Security continues to have “preliminary conversations” about data sharing, the Justice Department said in a subsequent court filing.

DHS operates the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, or SAVE, system that can scan voter data to identify possible noncitizens. The Justice Department has sued 30 states in an effort to force them to turn over their unredacted voter rolls, which include sensitive personal data such as dates of birth, driver’s license and full or partial Social Security numbers, for the purpose of running the information through SAVE.

The proposed Postal Service rule also imposes standards on ballot envelopes that states must meet if they want to send ballots through the mail.

Envelopes must include an election mail logo, be automation compatible and have a bar code that allows for tracking. These are already considered best practices — and many jurisdictions across the country already follow them — but the rule would make them mandatory.

Election offices in small, rural counties may struggle to comply. In many places, a single person is in charge of elections and may not even be on the job full time, Patrick said.

“There’s rural offices all across the country, some of them don’t have their own computer in their office — they are sharing it with the tax assessor or whatever — they don’t have the ability to generate those serialized tracking codes, intelligent mail bar codes,” Patrick said. “Because they’re physically hand-writing these envelopes out or they’re using a rubber stamp with their address on it.”

Neither the executive order or the proposed Postal Service rule include any federal funding for implementation, something that would likely have to be appropriated by Congress.

Some Republican states have championed the executive order. A dozen GOP state attorneys general filed court documents defending the order and arguing that it “will enhance the security of absentee voting.”

“It is vital to the strength of our republic that we ensure only American citizens vote in our elections and that mail-in and absentee ballots are secure and reliable,” South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson said in a statement earlier this spring.

But Matt Crane, a Republican who is the executive director of the Colorado County Clerks Association, said the executive order and the proposed rule mark an overreach by the federal government into duties best left to states and local governments.

The biggest reaction among Colorado clerks, he said, has been, “why?”

“No offense to our friends at the post office,” Crane said, “but I trust our processes more than I trust theirs.”

June 16, 2026
Kennedy Center facade blocked from public view by tarp after Trump’s name removed

By Sam Gauntt
National

Weathproof tarp

Days after President Donald Trump’s name was removed from the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, a large tarp and scaffolding was still blocking the building’s facade from public view Monday afternoon.

Construction crews took Trump’s name off the center early Saturday morning after a federal appeals court upheld a Friday deadline for its removal.

But at the start of the work week, the portion of the building’s facade where Trump’s name was located was almost entirely obstructed.

A weatherproof tarp covers the facade of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C., on June 15, 2026. (Photo by Sam Gauntt/States Newsroom)

According to a Kennedy Center spokesperson, the scaffolding and tarp will remain up while crews perform maintenance on the marble and soffit panels on the building’s facade.

The center did not provide any indication about how long the maintenance work will take or when the tarps will be taken down.

The removal of Trump’s name came as a blow to his efforts over the course of his second term to take direct control of the center’s governance and get rid of what he described as “woke” programming.

Early last year, he appointed a new, hand-selected board of trustees for the center. They subsequently named him chair. Last December, he even personally hosted the Kennedy Centers Honors, the annual tribute show celebrating significant contributions to performing arts.

In February, Trump announced that he planned to close the Kennedy Center for two years while working on significant renovations.

Ohio lawmaker sues

In the midst of these changes to the center, Rep. Joyce Beatty, D-Ohio, filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration in late December, challenging the legality of the president renaming the center after himself. She amended the suit in February, seeking to block the closure as well.

U.S. District Judge Christopher R. Cooper ruled in favor of Beatty on May 29, ordering that Trump’s name come down, and that the center similarly remove references to Trump from its website and online branding.

The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C., with President Donald Trump’s name on the facade is pictured May 5, 2026. (Photo by Ashley Murray/States Newsroom)

After Cooper ruled, Trump took to Truth Social and blasted the judge, whom he described as an “anti-Trump Hater,” for stopping the “magnificent structural and aesthetic rebuilding of The Trump Kennedy Center.”

Cooper’s order also halted the planned two-year closure of the center. The Trump administration appealed the ruling, but a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld Cooper’s decision Friday evening.

Beatty, one of seven U.S. House members on the center’s board, said in a statement last week that the Kennedy Center’s newly appointed trustees are “more focused on elevating the president than advancing the arts.”

“The court was clear in its order because the statute is clear: only Congress can change the name of the Kennedy Center,” Beatty said. “My hope moving forward is that the board restores the integrity of the Kennedy Center, rebuilds programming and respects the rule of law. This beloved national treasure deserves nothing less.”

A weatherproof tarp is affixed to the facade of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C., on June 15, 2026. (Photo by Sam Gauntt/States Newsroom)

Beatty did not immediately return States Newsroom’s request for comment Monday afternoon.

But even though Trump’s name is gone, the center is still shrouded in legal uncertainty.

In his May order, Cooper wrote that his ruling was not an effort to control how the center should be run or set a plan for it going forward. Rather, he said it was to hold the Kennedy Center’s Board to the requirements set by the law.

Beyond that, he wrote, the court will “let the parties play on.”

June 15, 2026
Ceasefire reached with Iran, ending hostilities and opening Strait of Hormuz

By Jennifer Shutt
Virginia Mercury

Ships anchored on May 16, 2026 in the Strait of Hormuz near Larak Island, Iran. (Photo by Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said Monday he had signed a ceasefire with Iran, moving the two countries one step closer to ending the war that began in February.

Trump, speaking from the G7 conference in Europe, said the memorandum of understanding ensures Iran cannot possess a nuclear weapon and clears the way for ships to move through the Strait of Hormuz without paying a toll.

Trump added he would like the U.S. and Iran to develop a more collegial diplomatic relation in the months and years ahead as additional details of the agreement are worked out.

“Hopefully it’s going to be a good relationship and we’re going to get along,” he said. “And if we don’t, we go back to where we started but I don’t think that’s going to be necessary.”

Trump said he expects the memorandum of understanding to pave the way for economic sanctions relief subject to several conditions. That document should be released publicly sometime after Friday, when Vice President JD Vance is scheduled to attend a ceremonial signing.

One potential obstacle to a longer-term deal could be the ongoing Israeli war in Lebanon, which Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif wrote in a social media post is part of the agreement between the U.S. and Iran.

“Both sides have declared the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon,” Sharif wrote.

He added that a ceremonial signing event had been scheduled for Friday in Switzerland.

“With the agreement now in place, mediators will facilitate a series of meetings this week,” Sharif wrote. “These pre-implementation discussions will lay the foundation for the technical talks and the official signing ceremony.”

Trump said from the G7 conference that he would look into ways to end Israel’s war in Lebanon, but didn’t say that is part of the United States’ agreement with Iran.

“We do want to see if we can straighten out the Lebanon thing because it just seems to just never end,” Trump said. “And that’s a mini version of what we were doing, but it should not be tough. So, Hezbollah we have to have a little talk with them.”

Israel not part of agreement

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said a couple hours after Trump spoke that he didn’t plan to withdraw troops from Gaza, Lebanon or Syria.

“I’d like to clarify, we will stay there in the security zone as long as it takes in order to protect our country,” he said, according to a translator.

Netanyahu added during his brief remarks that he believed the joint military campaign against Iran prevented that country from developing a nuclear weapon.

“The most important thing is that we saved the state of Israel from clear and present nuclear danger because Iran was running toward it,” he said.

But Netanyahu indicated his country’s military would not pull back in the days or months ahead, saying “the struggle has not finished yet.”

“Today after we achieved all of that, there are those who want to belittle it and cancel these achievements and I’m telling you we are about to achieve many more great things and to eliminate threats,” Netanyahu said.

The remarks were somewhat different from those posted earlier in the day by the Israeli minister of national security who appeared to oppose the agreement between the U.S. and Iran.

“Trump’s agreement does not bind us,” Itamar Ben-Gvir wrote in a social media post. “Israel is not subject to the United States, and we are an independent and sovereign nation!”

Israel and the United States began the war in Iran together, but the Israeli military has also struck targets and taken territory inside Lebanon during the past few months.

Framework for peace

Trump’s comments came just after two senior U.S. officials, who did not wish to be identified by name, told reporters on a call organized by the White House that Vance and Iran’s parliamentary Speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf also signed the MOU.

That document, one official said, creates a framework for how both countries will operate during the next few months as talks over some of the more complicated aspects continue.

“The basic way it works is the more that the Iranians are willing to work with us on their nuclear program, on verifying that they’re not building a nuclear weapon, on not funding radicalism and terrorism in the region, the more that they’re going to be welcomed into the world economy through a combination of sanctions relief and other economic measures,” the official said.

That official said it would take some time for oil tankers and other ships to operate in the Strait of Hormuz the way they did before the war due to the mines Iran placed in those waters during the past few months.

“Some crews are ready to go now, and in fact, have been going over the last couple of weeks,” the official said. “Some crews want to see a little bit more stability for the next couple of days, maybe the next couple of weeks. But you will see a significant increase in traffic in the Strait of Hormuz.”

The official noted the relationships built between negotiators from both countries could lead to a new phase of diplomatic relations that hasn’t occurred since before the Iranian revolution in the late 1970s.

“One of the really cool things and interesting things about this entire process is that we actually have a direct relationship with a number of people at the highest levels of the Iranian government,” the official said. “That really hasn’t happened in 47 years of our relationship with Iran. And I think it’s one of the reasons why we’ve made significant progress and understood, you know, where they’re willing to give and where we still have some wood to chop.”

The official said the heightened U.S. military presence will remain in the region as negotiations take place over how exactly inspectors can ensure Iran doesn’t try to rebuild its nuclear program.

“The agreement contemplates the reduction of military forces in the region upon the agreement of a final deal, which again is the agreement that we assume we can make, so long as the Iranians make some concessions and give up some of their activities and some of their nuclear program,” the official said.

Sanctions and Iran nuclear program

The United States, so far, has not unfrozen any seized Iranian assets or lifted any sanctions, though that will likely change in the months ahead.

“The way that I think about this is, Iran’s nuclear weapons program has been systematically destroyed. In order to rebuild it, they need a lot of money, and this deal really has two pathways,” the official said.

“Option one for Iran is they don’t get any money, and so they don’t have the resources to rebuild their defense industrial base or the nuclear weapons program,” the official added. “Option two is they are invited into the world economy with all the prosperity that comes along with it, but only if they provide us the enforcement and verification mechanism to ensure they’re not going to rebuild that nuclear weapon.”

The second official on the call gave a faster timeline for releasing text of the memorandum of understanding than the president, saying it would be shared publicly within 24 to 48 hours.

“You’ll see in the MOU, we discussed the possibility of releasing frozen funds, sanctions relief, you know, a big $300 billion fund to rebuild their country,” the second official said. “And all of these things are going to be tied to performance.”

That second official added this is “just the first MOU” and that negotiators from the U.S. and Iran are going to begin “technical discussions later this week.”

The second official said that Israel withdrawing its troops from Lebanon “was not a condition” of the current deal between the U.S. and Iran.

“The deal is a ceasefire. And it will not be a one-way ceasefire, meaning that if Iran is not able to control Hezbollah, and if they attack Israeli positions or Israeli towns, Israel will have the right to defend themselves and respond,” the second official said.

There is hope within the Trump administration, the official said, that talks between Israel, Lebanon and Secretary of State Marco Rubio would also lead to a ceasefire in that war.

“The first point in the MOU talks about how Iran and its allies and America and its allies seek to have a ceasefire and end hostilities, end the war and hopefully have a final peace that hopefully will include a lot of these proxy groups,” the second official said. “And hopefully this will help us get the Israel-Lebanon normalization and peace done properly.”

June 15, 2026
The House and Senate both released new budgets. Here’s how they align and diverge.

By Shannon Heckt, Charlotte Rene Woods, Nathaniel Cline, Samantha Willis
Virginia Mercury

The state Capitol building in Richmond. Lawmakers must reconcile the budget by June 30 to avoid a state government shutdown. (Photo by Charlotte Rene Woods/Virginia Mercury)

With a June 30 deadline looming before a state government shutdown, Virginia legislators have released new budget proposals, the latest actions in a long-simmering debate over the state spending plan that has deadlocked over whether data centers should keep being exempt from the state’s sales and use tax.

Virginia House of Delegates leaders presented their updated budget proposal Friday, revamping their $74 billion funding plan based on a new revenue forecast ordered by Gov. Abigail Spanberger last month. The House budget no longer includes environmental standards that data centers would have to meet to keep the exemption, which saves the industry nearly $2 billion annually.

New House budget strips environmental standards for data centers, creates commission instead

Hours after the new House budget was unveiled, Sen. Louise Lucas, D-Portsmouth, divulged an updated Senate budget proposal, with scant details, on social media.

While Lucas didn’t outline the particulars of the plan, she said it included a 4% raise for teachers, $345 million for health and human services initiatives including food assistance for low-income Virginians and a $100 “fair share” rebate for individuals.

Here’s how each chamber plans to address key issues in the next two-year state budget.

Chambers still at odds over data centers

The data center sales and use tax exemption remains the biggest bottle neck on state budget negotiations.. The state currently forgoes an average of $1.6 billion annually by allowing the industry to not pay the 5.3% state tax on their computer equipment and server racks.

Lucas and some other lawmakers are pushing to end the exemption that began as an incentive to draw the industry to the commonwealth in 2008 and cost the state about $1.5 million at the time.

Lawmakers in the House of Delegates, including Speaker Don Scott, consider the exemption a strong driver for union electrical and construction jobs, whose workers build the facilities that make major investments on the local level. The House’s previous budget would keep the exemption in place and require data centers to use cleaner back up generators, improve their energy efficiency, and take other environmental steps to keep the tax break.

The House’s updated budget preserves the exemption through 2035 and eliminates the environmental standards. Instead, the House proposed creating a commission made up of legislators and stakeholders to examine data centers’ energy use and how the industry impacts the state and local tax revenues.

A similar report was released by the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission in 2024. But Spanberger, who supports the House’s plan, said the new commission would dig deeper and produce more in-depth reports that would help drive policy decisions in the next regular session of the General Assembly.

Concerning the proposed commission’s focus, Spanberger said Friday, “We want a little bit more help in understanding if we’re making good choices for our communities. (Such as) rules of the road, best practices, whether it’s setbacks or noise reductions, limits on diesel generators, requirements for battery backup.”

The Senate has not released the full context of their new updated budget proposal but it includes a “tiered state impact fee,” Lucas said in her social media statement. The fee would be placed on the facilities according to their generator type and their energy capacity. Lucas said the system would generate an estimated $1.7 billion in tax revenue for the state but didn’t detail how. Her office did not have further details of the proposal available for clarification on Monday.

Lucas also said the new Senate budget includes funding for a work group to study the tax exemption and other potential protections for ratepayers and local communities, similar to the house’s proposed commission.

Cannabis market still hazy

After Spanberger vetoed bipartisan legislation to create a retail market for recreational cannabis, House lawmakers said Friday that the proposal has been added to their updated budget.

Few details were available Friday about the weed market plan, spearheaded by Del. Paul Krizek, D-Fairfax, but he confirmed “we have a deal, and it’s just a matter of finishing the legal edits” of the retail market framework. Krizek said more details would be released in a joint press conference with Spanberger on Tuesday.

House lawmakers also added “$865,000 each year from the general fund and four positions to support workload increases” in the The Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services’ Office of Weights and Measures to their updated spending plan, “related to the establishment of an adult-use recreational cannabis market.”

The overview of the new Senate budget shared by Lucas didn’t include the cannabis framework. However, the chamber passed SB 542, the companion measure to the House bill which would create the marketplace. And the Senate ’s two-year budget pitched before the end of this year’s legislative session includes over $12 million for the operation of the Virginia Cannabis Control Authority over two years.

Navigating healthcare hurdles

Because Virginia and other states are required to reduce their Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program error rate to 6% by next year, House lawmakers earmarked $130 million to fund new cost share benefit allotments.

Sometimes errors in overpaying or underpaying households arise from paperwork mistakes by government staff or outdated information from beneficiaries. A federal law passed last summer mandates states drop their error rates.

That same law also entails verification changes to Medicaid, which is estimated to put thousands of Virginians at risk of losing coverage and add financial strains to hospitals.

These shifts are why the state budget proposals from both chambers include money to help streamline compliance for social service workers around the state and mitigate insurance drop offs.

The new proposal from the House maintains a $2.4 billion increase to fully fund Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program forecasts. It would also add $39 million to partially restore proposed cuts to Medicaid and CHIP.

House lawmakers earmarked $3 million to support social service staff compliance with the new SNAP and Medicaid federal standards.

Where a previous version of the House budget entailed a $5 million increase in funding for the state’s free clinics, the new draft increased it to $13 million. An already “strained safety net,” free clinics are bracing for an influx in uninsured patients as people lose Medicaid or ACA and are a key partner for hospitals to reduce caseloads in emergency rooms.

A holdover from the chamber’s previous proposal, lawmakers would direct $79.1 million towards a state-level version of the expired Affordable Care Act subsidies that Congress let expire last year.

“We’ve never had this much of an onus on the state before,” Henrico Democratic Del. Rodney Willett, who chairs the House’s Health and Human Services Committee, said in a previous interview. “It will take a lot of work with the people, processes and systems to go with that.”

Over 33,000 Virginians and counting have dropped their ACA insurance so far this year amid rising premiums. Of Virginia’s roughly 400,000 ACA clients, about 100,000 have been estimated to have lost the subsidies.

Likewise, the Senate has its ideas for addressing the federal fallout too.

Its newest version still includes $200 million for a state-level ACA subsidy along with a special enrollment period for people who dropped off and want to sign back up for insurance.

Health and human services work in the state would receive $345 million and would address a range of programs, from Medicaid to SNAP to developmental disability waiver rates.

It’s unclear how that will be divided up as the Senate had not fully released its next proposed version of the budget by the time of this publication. Initially, the chamber had settled on $135 million for SNAP, with lawmakers assuming the state cannot drop below a 10% error rate.

More recently, the chamber suggested $190 million to offset future rate increases in state employee health insurance premiums.

Housing support boosted

As a flurry of housing bills passed the legislature and were signed into law by the governor, both budget proposals entail funding to help get them off the ground — but they differ in how that should happen.

The House’s new draft would invest an additional $20 million into the Virginia Housing Trust Fund. The program offers loans for low-income housing projects and provides grants to organizations that serve unhoused people. The additional boost brings the House’s earmark for the fund up to $195 million over the next two years.

The House also wants to add $14 million over the next two years to support organizations that work with unhoused populations or help people at risk of homelessness.

As state lawmakers have refined Virginia’s Eviction Reduction Program, the House proposes $11.5 million in new resources for it, bringing total support to $18.5 million over the biennium.

On housing, the preview of the Senate’s forthcoming new budget draft entails $110 million for housing-related initiatives “including eviction reduction, weatherization programs, and Housing Trust Fund deposits.”

K-12, school construction funding reflects uncertainty

Local governments and school leaders are waiting on the budget to be finalized to decide how they will be able to cover teacher pay raises, and how much those raises will be. The legislature’s dueling spending plans also address another key concern: covering construction and modernization costs for the upcoming school year.

The House’s revised budget proposes a 3% raise for state and state-supported employees, including teachers, over the next two years, while the new Senate budget includes a 4% increase aimed at moving Virginia toward the national average teacher salary.

“With inflation being over 4%, a 3% raise does not really end up being a raise, it’s a pay cut in practice, and the average teacher would lose money in buying power,” Carol Bauer, president of the Virginia Education Association, said.

In the area of school construction, the House’s revised proposal includes an additional $299 million for school construction grants, bringing the biennial total to $519 million.

In contrast, Lucas’ overview of the updated Senate budget did not mention school construction grants. In February, the body approved a plan to allocate $172 million from the Literary Fund to the School Construction Fund for construction and renovation grants.

However, the Senate’s plans for the grants and the School Construction Fund remain uncertain, because its funding relied on expected casino tax revenues under the chamber’s previous budget.

Additionally, the House is now proposing to move the $172 million originally from the Literary Fund to cover teacher retirement costs, adding to the unpredictability.

Both chambers still proposed expanding a 1% sales tax to pay for construction costs; however, the House version goes further, permitting jurisdictions in Planning District 8, or Northern Virginia, to use these funds for transportation projects to address public transit needs in that region.

Among other notable budget moves, the House announced that the previously proposed $400 million one-time flexible funding was removed and replaced by a $98.4 million one-time supplement for at-risk student programs.

The amended House budget returned $10.1 million in unused laboratory school funds to the state’s main funding pool.

Both budget proposals are similar in that they fund the state’s special education line item: the House proposes $148.4 million, compared to the $150 million Lucas mentioned in her letter about the Senate’s revamped plan.

The delayed completion of the budget “puts hardship on school districts trying to get contracts out, puts a hardship on folks knowing what their actual compensation is going to be for the next year, and so we honestly would like things to get settled,” Bauer said.

House meets this week, Senate the next

The House reconvenes Thursday and the Senate is scheduled to meet in Richmond June 22. The chambers must reconcile their spending plans and approve a new budget before the June 30 deadline, or a state government shutdown — the first in the state’s history — will ensue.

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

SUPPORT

June 15, 2026
Bloody UFC cage match on White House lawn marks Trump’s 80th birthday

By Ashley Murray
National

Justin Gaethje talks to President Donald Trump after defeating Ilia Topuria in a lightweight title bout during UFC Freedom 250 on the South Lawn of the White House on June 15, 2026 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump celebrated his 80th birthday Sunday cageside at a multimillion-dollar bloody mixed martial arts event staged on the White House South Lawn, punctuated by fighter jet flyovers, a live military band and fireworks to mark the country’s 250th anniversary.

It also included the airing of a conspiracy theory about a former first lady, Michelle Obama, during post-fight comments by one of the contestants.

The spectacle promoted by the Las Vegas-based Ultimate Fighting Championship, billed as Freedom 250, was exclusively shown on the paid subscription platform Paramount+. The Trump-organized event was not affiliated with the national nonpartisan organization America 250, a commission created by Congress.

Aside from a blood sport taking place in the backyard of the White House, the night served as a first for several other extraordinary sights. That included live pre-fight sports commentary from inside the White House, and fighters warming up in offices-turned-lockerrooms at the neighboring Eisenhower Executive Office Building.

The Ultimate Fighting Championship ring on the White House South Lawn on Thursday, June 11, 2026. (Photo by Ashley Murray/States Newsroom)

VIPs, including members of Congress and tech giants, sat under the lights in the temporary arena able to hold up to 4,300 guests. Tens of thousands of UFC fans crowded the Ellipse, where the fights were displayed on two mammoth screens.

The event reportedly cost $60 million, according to a government court filing. VIP sponsorship packages, including a chance to sit cage-side under “the claw” cost up to the widely reported price tag of $1.5 million.

Between praise for the American military and Jesus Christ, fighters delivered insulting and expletive-laden comments from inside “the Octagon.” Two American fighters, Bo Nikal and Josh Hokit, thanked Trump for having “the balls” to host the event at the White House.

Hokit, a former NFL player, during his live post-fight comments to massively popular podcast host Joe Rogan, insulted Brazilian fighter Alex Pereira’s mother and then repeated a right-wing conspiracy theory claiming former first lady Michelle Obama is “a man.”

Josh Hokit gifts @POTUS his chain 🤣🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/506ZwmKavg

— Margo Martin (@MargoMartin47) June 15, 2026

Rogan did not challenge the comment. Shortly after his remark, Hokit placed his victory chain around Trump’s neck and the two shook hands. The moment was captured and posted on social media by White House special assistant Margo Martin.

The official UFC YouTube clip of the California heavyweight’s speech does not include his unfounded insult of Obama.

Bright lights and flyovers

Spotlights from the UFC’s 92-foot steel canopy that dwarfed the White House and towered over “the Octagon” cage could be seen in the night sky from neighborhoods around Washington, D.C., and several residents took to social media to complain that a B-1 bomber flyover at 11:30 p.m. Eastern woke them. Fireworks exploded until nearly 1:30 a.m.

Drinks in hand, U.S. service members in short-sleeve dress uniforms celebrated from the seats — several sailors even taking part in the “YMCA” dance during the Marine Corps band’s live cover of the Village People’s 1978 hit, a staple at Trump’s events.

Trump and UFC CEO Dana White entered the arena just before 8:30 p.m. Shortly after, a dozen fighter jets, in a joint “Super Delta” formation performed by the U.S. Air Force Thunderbirds and Navy Blue Angels, flew overhead during the national anthem, performed by country music star Zac Brown.

Trump sat just below the fighting cage between first lady Melania Trump and White, an ally who has delivered primetime addresses in support of Trump at the 2016, 2020 and 2024 Republican National Conventions.

Trump was surrounded by family, including his son, Barron, who sat behind him and shook hands with several guests who approached the president, according to pooled dispatches from the White House press corps.

Several winning fighters jumped over the cage rail to shake the president’s hand following the individual matches.

Eight US fighters

Of the seven-fight card’s 14 competitors, eight were American. The violent bouts were accompanied by cheers of “USA!” and various taunts, including shouts that Canada should be “the 51st state” as American bantamweight fighter Sean O’Malley defeated Canada’s Aiemann Zahabi. Trump applauded O’Malley and shook his hand following the individual fight.

The main event featured a title match between lightweights American Justin Gaethje and Spanish-Georgian Ilia Topuria. Officials named Gaethje the winner just after 1 a.m., as the badly battered Topuria, with a bloodied face, was declared incapable of continuing, according to pool reports.

Fighters were paid a $250,000 performance bonus sponsored by World Liberty Financial, a crypto currency venture owned by the Trump family, according to broadcast announcers.

Cameras delivering the exclusive Paramount stream showed notable lawmakers and tech moguls in the crowd, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., former wrestler and college wrestling coach Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg. The press corps reported Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., was also nearby.

Trump, Zuckerberg and White spoke for several minutes during a break in the fights just before 10 p.m., according to pool reports.

Other notable guests included Kris Marszalek, CEO of Crypto.com, one of the event’s two primary sponsors, and Polish President Karol Nawrocki.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump’s former personal defense attorney and his attorney general nominee, shook hands as he moved through the crowd, according to press pool reports. Several other presidential Cabinet members were present, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who on Thursday signed a “sports diplomacy” agreement with UFC.

Also in attendance was Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison, whose reportedly $111 billion corporate takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery, was cleared by the Justice Department Friday, a key last step for the merger.

Paramount+ has a $7.7 billion multi-year content deal to exclusively carry UFC events.

The event, which was to start at 8 p.m., was delayed for roughly an hour because of the threat of thunderstorms. The fights wrapped up just after 1 a.m.

Weekend festivities included a UFC press conference Friday night in front of the Lincoln Memorial, and a two-day fan festival on the Ellipse that featured motorcycle stunts from the Nitro Circus and a concert from the Georgia-based Zac Brown Band.

The UFC controlled media credentialing for the event on the White House grounds.

‘No Kings’ protest

The event faced sharp criticism but remained unscathed by an eleventh-hour lawsuit challenging the legality of UFC’s use of the White House lawn.

Performers and celebrities staged a counter-concert organized by the Committee for the First Amendment, an activist coalition of artists spearheaded by Jane Fonda.

The No Kings protest organization promoted a livestream from The Town Hall in New York City, and encouraged people to organize remote watch parties for the “Rise Up, Sing Out” concert featuring Patti Smith, Bette Midler and Rufus Wainwright, among others.

C-SPAN also streamed the nearly two-and-a-half hour concert, though some performances were muted because of licensing restrictions.

June 15, 2026
Ceasefire reached with Iran, ending hostilities and opening Strait of Hormuz

By Jennifer Shutt
National

Ships anchored on May 16, 2026 in the Strait of Hormuz near Larak Island, Iran. (Photo by Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said Monday he had signed a ceasefire with Iran, moving the two countries one step closer to ending the war that began in February.

Trump, speaking from the G7 conference in Europe, said the memorandum of understanding ensures Iran cannot possess a nuclear weapon and clears the way for ships to move through the Strait of Hormuz without paying a toll.

Trump added he would like the U.S. and Iran to develop a more collegial diplomatic relation in the months and years ahead as additional details of the agreement are worked out.

“Hopefully it’s going to be a good relationship and we’re going to get along,” he said. “And if we don’t, we go back to where we started but I don’t think that’s going to be necessary.”

Trump said he expects the memorandum of understanding to pave the way for economic sanctions relief subject to several conditions. That document should be released publicly sometime after Friday, when Vice President JD Vance is scheduled to attend a ceremonial signing.

One potential obstacle to a longer-term deal could be the ongoing Israeli war in Lebanon, which Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif wrote in a social media post is part of the agreement between the U.S. and Iran.

“Both sides have declared the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon,” Sharif wrote.

He added that a ceremonial signing event had been scheduled for Friday in Switzerland.

“With the agreement now in place, mediators will facilitate a series of meetings this week,” Sharif wrote. “These pre-implementation discussions will lay the foundation for the technical talks and the official signing ceremony.”

Trump said from the G7 conference that he would look into ways to end Israel’s war in Lebanon, but didn’t say that is part of the United States’ agreement with Iran.

“We do want to see if we can straighten out the Lebanon thing because it just seems to just never end,” Trump said. “And that’s a mini version of what we were doing, but it should not be tough. So, Hezbollah we have to have a little talk with them.”

Israel not part of agreement

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said a couple hours after Trump spoke that he didn’t plan to withdraw troops from Gaza, Lebanon or Syria.

“I’d like to clarify, we will stay there in the security zone as long as it takes in order to protect our country,” he said, according to a translator.

Netanyahu added during his brief remarks that he believed the joint military campaign against Iran prevented that country from developing a nuclear weapon.

“The most important thing is that we saved the state of Israel from clear and present nuclear danger because Iran was running toward it,” he said.

But Netanyahu indicated his country’s military would not pull back in the days or months ahead, saying “the struggle has not finished yet.”

“Today after we achieved all of that, there are those who want to belittle it and cancel these achievements and I’m telling you we are about to achieve many more great things and to eliminate threats,” Netanyahu said.

The remarks were somewhat different from those posted earlier in the day by the Israeli minister of national security who appeared to oppose the agreement between the U.S. and Iran.

“Trump’s agreement does not bind us,” Itamar Ben-Gvir wrote in a social media post. “Israel is not subject to the United States, and we are an independent and sovereign nation!”

Israel and the United States began the war in Iran together, but the Israeli military has also struck targets and taken territory inside Lebanon during the past few months.

Framework for peace

Trump’s comments came just after two senior U.S. officials, who did not wish to be identified by name, told reporters on a call organized by the White House that Vance and Iran’s parliamentary Speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf also signed the MOU.

That document, one official said, creates a framework for how both countries will operate during the next few months as talks over some of the more complicated aspects continue.

“The basic way it works is the more that the Iranians are willing to work with us on their nuclear program, on verifying that they’re not building a nuclear weapon, on not funding radicalism and terrorism in the region, the more that they’re going to be welcomed into the world economy through a combination of sanctions relief and other economic measures,” the official said.

That official said it would take some time for oil tankers and other ships to operate in the Strait of Hormuz the way they did before the war due to the mines Iran placed in those waters during the past few months.

“Some crews are ready to go now, and in fact, have been going over the last couple of weeks,” the official said. “Some crews want to see a little bit more stability for the next couple of days, maybe the next couple of weeks. But you will see a significant increase in traffic in the Strait of Hormuz.”

The official noted the relationships built between negotiators from both countries could lead to a new phase of diplomatic relations that hasn’t occurred since before the Iranian revolution in the late 1970s.

“One of the really cool things and interesting things about this entire process is that we actually have a direct relationship with a number of people at the highest levels of the Iranian government,” the official said. “That really hasn’t happened in 47 years of our relationship with Iran. And I think it’s one of the reasons why we’ve made significant progress and understood, you know, where they’re willing to give and where we still have some wood to chop.”

The official said the heightened U.S. military presence will remain in the region as negotiations take place over how exactly inspectors can ensure Iran doesn’t try to rebuild its nuclear program.

“The agreement contemplates the reduction of military forces in the region upon the agreement of a final deal, which again is the agreement that we assume we can make, so long as the Iranians make some concessions and give up some of their activities and some of their nuclear program,” the official said.

Sanctions and Iran nuclear program

The United States, so far, has not unfrozen any seized Iranian assets or lifted any sanctions, though that will likely change in the months ahead.

“The way that I think about this is, Iran’s nuclear weapons program has been systematically destroyed. In order to rebuild it, they need a lot of money, and this deal really has two pathways,” the official said.

“Option one for Iran is they don’t get any money, and so they don’t have the resources to rebuild their defense industrial base or the nuclear weapons program,” the official added. “Option two is they are invited into the world economy with all the prosperity that comes along with it, but only if they provide us the enforcement and verification mechanism to ensure they’re not going to rebuild that nuclear weapon.”

The second official on the call gave a faster timeline for releasing text of the memorandum of understanding than the president, saying it would be shared publicly within 24 to 48 hours.

“You’ll see in the MOU, we discussed the possibility of releasing frozen funds, sanctions relief, you know, a big $300 billion fund to rebuild their country,” the second official said. “And all of these things are going to be tied to performance.”

That second official added this is “just the first MOU” and that negotiators from the U.S. and Iran are going to begin “technical discussions later this week.”

The second official said that Israel withdrawing its troops from Lebanon “was not a condition” of the current deal between the U.S. and Iran.

“The deal is a ceasefire. And it will not be a one-way ceasefire, meaning that if Iran is not able to control Hezbollah, and if they attack Israeli positions or Israeli towns, Israel will have the right to defend themselves and respond,” the second official said.

There is hope within the Trump administration, the official said, that talks between Israel, Lebanon and Secretary of State Marco Rubio would also lead to a ceasefire in that war.

“The first point in the MOU talks about how Iran and its allies and America and its allies seek to have a ceasefire and end hostilities, end the war and hopefully have a final peace that hopefully will include a lot of these proxy groups,” the second official said. “And hopefully this will help us get the Israel-Lebanon normalization and peace done properly.”

June 15, 2026
‘It’s outrageous’: Spanberger navigates budget fight, Democratic unrest six months into governorship

By Markus Schmidt
Virginia Mercury

Gov. Abigail Spanberger signs legislation in Richmond in April. Spanberger’s first six months in office have been marked by clashes over vetoes, affordability policies and ongoing budget negotiations tied to data center tax incentives. (Photo courtesy of the Virginia Governor’s Office)

Back in January, Gov. Abigail Spanberger arrived in office promising pragmatism, affordability and a less combative style of politics.

Fast forward a few months, and Virginia’s first woman governor finds herself navigating one of the rockiest starts to a Democratic administration in years, with budget negotiations intensifying weeks before a shutdown deadline, frustration simmering inside her own party over a wave of vetoes and lawmakers openly questioning her governing style.

“I think it’s outrageous that we are where we are, and I hear from many legislators that they are displeased with the process,” Spanberger said during an interview with The Mercury at her office in Richmond Thursday, referring to the state’s still unfinished biennial spending plan.

“And I know that they are making that known to their individual bodies. And we will get there, because we have to.”

The impasse has overshadowed much of Spanberger’s opening months in office. Democratic leaders remain divided over whether to scale back Virginia’s lucrative data center tax incentives and how aggressively to regulate the fast-growing industry.

Lawmakers face a June 30 deadline to approve a spending plan before the new fiscal year begins July 1. Without a deal, Virginia could enter an unprecedented government shutdown.

The fight has also exposed tensions between Spanberger and some top Democrats in the legislature who expected a smoother relationship with a governor from their own party after four years of divided government under Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin.

Spanberger vetoed or amended a series of high-profile Democratic priorities this year, including legislation tied to collective bargaining, cannabis retail sales, immigration enforcement, prescription drug pricing and class-action lawsuits. The pushback triggered unusually public criticism from key Democrats and labor advocates.

Political analyst Bob Holsworth said the administration’s first few months have been shakier than many Democrats anticipated.

“By and large, I think it’s been a wobbly term for sure,” Holsworth said. “We’ve never seen the kind of vetoes that we had before, and the Democrats are in a position that’s almost embarrassing in terms of the budget.”

Still, Spanberger rejects the idea that her administration so far has been defined mainly by conflict.

In the interview, she instead pointed to Democratic priorities she signed into law, including paid family and medical leave, maternal health legislation, healthcare affordability measures and an assault weapons ban. She also backed constitutional amendments protecting reproductive rights and marriage equality.

“I’ve signed more than 100 bills that Governor Youngkin had vetoed,” she said.

Richmond versus the rest of Virginia

Spanberger said one of the biggest surprises on the job has been the disconnect she sees between debates dominating Capitol Square and the concerns she hears while traveling the commonwealth.

“How different things are here in Richmond, or even Capitol Square, versus everywhere else in Virginia,” she said, recalling recent visits to Abingdon, Washington County, Blacksburg and Surry County during Virginia Agriculture Week.

“The things people are talking about at times are very, very different from the things that people are talking about in Richmond,” she said.

Spanberger said that disconnect has influenced how she approaches many of the biggest issues coming out of the General Assembly.

While progressive lawmakers pushed for sweeping changes on labor, environmental and criminal justice issues, Spanberger said she often evaluates legislation differently now as governor, focusing more heavily on implementation, agency capacity and long-term economic effects.

“It’s important to me that not only are we getting it right, but when there’s clear places and areas for improvement in terms of how we can set up state agencies or entities for that implementation, we need to make those changes,” she said.

Spanberger pointed to paid family and medical leave as an example of a policy she supports but also requires careful implementation.

“Virginia is the 14th state in the country to adopt a policy like this. It’s a policy that I think people are going to feel in a positive way, but it is a major shift, and we have to get it right,” she said.

But Holsworth said many lawmakers expected clearer guidance from the governor earlier in the legislative process, especially relating to the state budget.

“She could have been involved earlier there,” he said. “Typically governors really try to do a more determined job of setting the parameters of the budget early on.”

Holsworth also argued the tensions reflect ideological shifts within the Democratic Party of Virginia.

“Virginia’s always had these pro-business governors, Democratic or Republicans,” he said. “But the legislative branch of the Democratic Party has moved a little further to the left.”

The data center divide

Sen. Louise Lucas on the Senate floor at the Virginia State Capitol in Richmond during this year’s legislative session. Lucas has emerged as one of the leading voices pushing to scale back Virginia’s data center tax incentives amid ongoing state budget negotiations. (Photo by Shannon Heckt/Virginia Mercury)

Much of the budget dispute comes down to disagreements over Virginia’s sales and use tax exemption for data center equipment, an incentive credited with helping the commonwealth become the world’s largest data center hub.

Sen. Louise Lucas, D-Portsmouth, the chair of the powerful Senate Finance and Appropriations Committee, wants to eliminate the incentive, arguing the state is subsidizing highly profitable corporations while residents face rising utility costs and environmental concerns.

Last week, Lucas announced that she would take the data center debate directly to the voters, launching a statewide listening tour focused on the industry’s impact on communities statewide.

Stops are planned across Virginia, including Hampton Roads on Sunday, Richmond and Northern Virginia as lawmakers continue weighing whether the state should scale back billions of dollars in tax incentives for the rapidly expanding sector.

Spanberger, however, has taken a more cautious approach.

“What is less part of the discussion is the end goal,” she said, warning that abruptly dismantling the tax break could trigger lawsuits, damage Virginia’s business reputation and destabilize local governments heavily dependent on data center revenue.

“Look at Mecklenburg, where they’ve built multiple public schools fully with data center funding,” Spanberger said. “When you have localities with nearly half their local revenues coming in from data centers, there’s some localities that are saying, wait, why are you going to pull up the ladder behind you?”

At the same time, she said the industry should face stricter standards on energy consumption, water usage and environmental impacts.

“If energy generation and energy consumption is a problem — and I’ve been very clear that data centers need to pay their fair share as relates to energy consumption — well, how do we get there?” she said.

Spanberger argued Virginia still holds leverage because companies want to locate in the commonwealth.

“We have a pretty significant stance to be able to say we have these very high standards, and we want you all to meet them,” she said.

On Friday, the House released a new budget proposal that would preserve the existing sales and use tax exemption for data centers while creating a commission to study the industry’s long-term impact on Virginia’s power grid, water resources and economy.

The revised plan also eliminated earlier Senate-backed environmental requirements opposed by industry groups and some business advocates. Spanberger, who has repeatedly argued the state should “honor its commitments” to companies that invested in Virginia under the current incentive structure, praised the House approach Friday.

“This proposal creates a clear roadmap for evaluating the impact of the data center industry in Virginia and for reassessing the state’s incentives into the future, with a focus on fairness to ratepayers and the needs of local communities,” Spanberger said in a statement.

Meanwhile, Senate Minority Leader Ryan McDougle, R-Hanover, blamed Democrats broadly — and Spanberger specifically — for the ongoing impasse.

“She’s the governor and it’s her party,” McDougle said in an interview Friday. “She should take the blame.”

McDougle also criticized what he described as a lack of policy engagement from the administration during the session.

“My conversations with the governor during the legislative process were always polite and courteous, but nothing substantive about policy. I would expect such conversations would have a significant policy component, and I did not see that from my perspective. And we did not see representatives of the administration at many of the committee hearings and debates,” McDougle said.

Holsworth said the budget stalemate has exposed deeper tensions over Virginia’s economic identity.

“You have one group of Democrats, with Spanberger leading it, saying that if we do this, our ranking, as the best state for business, is really going to take a hit,” he said.

“On the other hand, you have Senator Louise Lucas and other people in the Senate, some Republicans included, saying, ‘Why in the world are we paying a couple of billion dollars a year to the richest people in the world as a tax exemption? We should get rid of it, or at least tone it down in some fashion.’”

Senate Minority leader Ryan McDougle, R-Hanover, speaks with reporters outside the Virginia State Capitol in Richmond last month as lawmakers continued negotiations over the state budget and data center tax incentives. (Photo by Shannon Heckt/Virginia Mercury)

Affordability and political pressure

Spanberger campaigned heavily on affordability last year, but acknowledged many Virginians still don’t feel economic relief.

“The measure of success keeps changing because all of the pressures that require us to work on issues of affordability and lowering costs keep getting worse,” she said.

She highlighted insulin cost reforms, healthcare changes involving insurance pre-authorization and housing measures she said will help residents more directly.

However, Spanberger acknowledged those gains collided with inflation and rising fuel prices.

“The progress we’re making is muted by the fact that there’s still pressures and bad policies that are negatively impacting people,” she said.

Republicans have repeatedly argued that Democratic policies are contributing to higher household costs.

McDougle said the governor’s policies contradict her campaign messaging on affordability and bipartisanship.

“She talked a lot about being for people and bipartisanness and affordability on the campaign trail. And then her initial policies, right out of the gate, were to raise everybody’s power bill through RGGI,” he said, referring to Democrats’ move to rejoin the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative.

The Spanberger administration pointed out that 75% of the governor’s “Affordable Virginia Agenda” passed with bipartisan support.

But Holsworth said Republicans moved quickly after Spanberger took office to define her politically before she could fully establish her governing identity.

“They went after her early, and I think they caught that team a little unaware,” Holsworth said. He added that many of Spanberger’s affordability initiatives may ultimately prove popular but are not tangible to many voters.

“The average person in the street knows that their electric bills and insurance bills are going up,” he said.

What comes after the budget

Even with the budget fight and criticism from some Democrats, Spanberger said she remains focused on longer-term priorities, particularly housing, childcare and administrative reforms.

“There’s more to do to continue to really push on the supply side challenge,” she said, referring to housing and childcare.

The governor is also closely watching Dominion Energy’s proposed merger with NextEra Energy, which would create one of the nation’s largest utility companies.

Spanberger said she sees possible benefits if the merger expands renewable energy production and lowers costs for ratepayers, but she also expressed concerns about long-term impacts on Virginia jobs and consumers.

“There also has to be some clear financial benefit for the fact that these two gigantic companies are endeavoring to merge to become even more enormous,” she said.

Spanberger also acknowledged that, as Virginia’s first woman governor, some reactions to her leadership may be shaped by expectations that previous governors did not face.

“I think that things are scrutinized differently, assumptions are made differently,” she said. “I might not be exactly in the model that people are used to.”

Still, she suggested that some of the criticism surrounding her first few months in office reflects discomfort with a governing style that does not fit traditional expectations of Virginia governors.

“The way that people will level critiques against me just objectively, they wouldn’t do it (to others),” Spanberger said. “They haven’t.”

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

SUPPORT

June 15, 2026
How public education has transformed in Virginia since the nation’s founding

By Nathaniel Cline
Virginia Mercury

On the cusp of the nation’s semiquincentennial, Virginia legislators, educators and communities are reflecting on how to meet the moment and overcome challenges that persist for public education and students here. (Photo by Getty Images)

Like the United States, Virginia’s K-12 education system has evolved over the last two and a half centuries to better meet family needs and prepare students for the future. In the 250 years since America declared its independence, changes in policy, instruction, and technology have continually reshaped Virginia’s public elementary, middle and high schools.

On the cusp of the nation’s semiquincentennial, Virginia legislators, educators and communities are reflecting on how to meet the moment and overcome challenges that persist for public education and students here.

Newport News Democratic Del. Shelly Simonds — who has experience as a classroom teacher, local school board advocate and a legislative lobbyist for educational change — suggested Virginia’s next chapter focus first on “making teaching a true profession.”

Accomplishing this requires better pay, benefits like paid family leave, and modernized school schedules that align with the workday, Simonds said.

“We haven’t professionalized the teacher work day,” said Simonds. “If we want to retain the best and brightest teachers — because every child deserves excellent, highly qualified teachers — we’re going to have to examine some of these outdated practices. I think essentially we’re taking advantage of the good will of our teachers.”

The state also needs to update schools’ curriculum for a tech-driven future and review federal policies that could threaten the state’s workforce and economy, Simonds and other legislators said.

Education policy changes made learning more inclusive, standardized achievement

Virginia has always served as a laboratory for education policy in the United States.

In the colonial era and ensuing decades, key policy changes redirected state funds from religious to public schools, which broadened access to public education.

In the 1950s and 1960s, desegregation opened public schools to all students regardless of skin color or background, diversifying school demographics and boosting educational equity.

Barbara Johns, who, as a teenager, helped organize a strike to desegregate schools in Prince Edward County. (Library of Virginia)

House Education Committee Chair Sam Rasoul, D-Roanoke, said public education in the state has evolved from elitism toward broader access, but warned that challenges remain.

“Statutorily, we have equal access and equity in education; however, in practice, we see the remnants not only of redlining, but that many poor neighborhoods have to suffer from lower access to resources due to the way we fund our schools, heavily reliant on local property taxes,” he said.

“We’re still fighting for equity in education and equality in access,” Rasoul added.

These policy developments culminated in the introduction of defined educational standards, ensuring a statewide baseline of academic achievement.

In 1995, Virginia created the Standards of Learning, setting expectations for student learning before graduation from public schools. This policy standardized benchmark outcomes for students and influenced statewide curriculum planning.

Since then, the state Board of Education has routinely updated these standards for each course subject, affecting instructional priorities and assessment.

“The standards-based movement isn’t about standardizing education. It’s about clear guardrails and high expectations for what students should learn,” said Chris Jones, executive director for the Virginia Association for Teaching, Learning and Leading (VATLL), an education advocacy group.

Beau Dickenson, the National Social Studies Leaders Association’s 2025 leader of the year, said standardized assessments matter but currently overemphasize rote knowledge rather than measuring what students can do with that knowledge.

Relatedly, having a standard for students to live up to is “noble,” said Del. Mike Cherry, R-Colonial Heights, but striking the right policy balance is key.

“I think (SOLs) were well-intentioned,” Cherry said. “I think the actual outcome has been, on some levels, a detriment to the learning environment. It’s become, in essence, teaching the test, so that you make sure they pass the test, not necessarily teaching all of the skills necessary that go beyond the test.”

Havelock School, a historic two-room schoolhouse in Richmond County, Virginia, stands as a reminder of the region’s rural educational heritage and community history. (Nathaniel Cline/Virginia Mercury)

While state policies have led to expanded standards and accountability, recent policy debates and reforms have coincided with more families choosing to homeschool or attend private schools, affecting public school enrollment and funding.

According to data collected from the Virginia Department of Education by the Home Educators Association of Virginia, homeschooling increased by 5.34% this year compared to the previous school year bringing the total of students to 66,117.

Rasoul attributed declining public school enrollment to declining birth rates, continued exploration of alternatives during the COVID-19 pandemic and the hyper-politicization of schools.

“Whether you be on the right or the left, there is a small frustration in recent years about how hyper-politicized public schools have become,” Rasoul said.

Most Democrats say public funds should continue to support the state school system. But with students turning to non-public school alternatives, some Republican lawmakers have called for public funds to be funneled to voucher programs for private schooling.

Del. Tom Garrett, R-Buckingham, said Virginia’s schools should teach students “how to think, and not what to think,” and argued that schools have moved “too far into the social realm” by addressing topics that should be up to parents to tackle with their children.

“I want schools to empower kids to be successful learners and critical thinkers, but some topics should remain with families,” Garrett said.

Shifts in instruction

For most of the state’s existence, Virginia’s educators taught using simple tools — chalkboards, textbooks and experience. As access to other materials and resources has grown, so has teachers’ knowledge, which they continue passing along to students.

But in recent years, critical thinking and customization have played a larger role, with educators and lawmakers realizing that not every student learns the same way and viewing each student as an individual with unique strengths, interests, and cultural backgrounds.

“(Virginia) is trying to move away from the one size fits all,” Jones said, “and really thinking about each student one at a time, and how they’re entering into their learning experiences, and then taking that information to get to where those standards say that each student needs to be at the end of their 13 years.”

A speaker holds up a sign supporting a draft of the history standards different from the version completed by the staff at the Virginia Department of Education. (Nathaniel Cline / Virginia Mercury)

The state is now placing more emphasis on assessing students before instruction begins, understanding each student’s current skill level, and providing support for those who need additional help and for those who are ready to move on to advanced coursework, Jones said.

Cherry criticized the state’s teaching model, citing pandemic-related learning loss and low reading levels as evidence that current approaches aren’t working.

“I think the idea that every student in every neighborhood that’s the same age is ready to learn the same information at the same time, there’s a fallacy in that, and I think it’s one of the big problems with public education now,” Cherry said.

Garrett added that Virginia educators must better prepare students for a globalized workforce.

“This is always going to be a moving target, because the skills that a young person needs to enter the workforce … is different in 1990 than it was in 2010, different in 2026 than it was in 2010,” Garrett said. “So we should always be looking at those.”

History and social sciences instruction have received extra scrutiny over the last few years, as public perceptions of what should be taught and how to teach it changed.

Dickenson said the state now implements history and social sciences lessons through inquiry-based methods rather than rote memorization.

“I was taught social studies in a very rote fashion, that it was all about names, dates, and places, and memorizing that information … and while that’s important, it’s not instructional best practice to just cover information,” Dickenson said.

Technology transforms and challenges

Democratic Lt. Gov. Ghazala Hashmi, a career educator, said technology has radically transformed classrooms, offering benefits for learning and beefing up critical thinking but creating challenges for schools trying to keep up with rapidly evolving applications and tools.

“Virginia is continuing to work to address the technological shifts, and we still have much more to do as we keep up with the pace of change,” Hashmi said.

The internet transformed curricula by vastly expanding access to information, Hashmi said, which makes information literacy — learning to discern reliable from unreliable sources — essential for students and the general public.

The U.S. Education Department urged schools and districts on Tuesday to set policies governing smartphone use in schools. (Photo by SDI Productions via Getty Images)

“Access to a global community of information puts considerable challenges on our students, on our educators,” Hashmi said. “We have to teach not just our students in the classroom, but the entire public on how to be able to discern information, how to be able to identify what is reliable versus what is not, and then how to be able to apply it effectively.”

Cherry said he has been impressed by the speed of electronic curriculum updates compared to the old printed textbooks. Meanwhile, others like Simmonds are raising awareness that technology is pressuring schools to adopt new tools and to consider curriculum trade-offs.

Responding to these shifts, Garrett is advocating for balance, naming concerns about students getting too much screen time, overreliance on tech and reduced interpersonal interaction.

“There’s a balancing act here… because you want to make sure that young people know how to send an email and maybe enter a good query into AI … you (also) want to make sure that they know how to interact comfortably in a social setting with other humans (and) that AI is not writing their paper for them,” Garrett said.

Dickenson says technology has greatly expanded access to information, but the pandemic showed its limits.Tech tools should be used to enhance learning rather than replace teachers or relationships, he added.

“We need to find an appropriate balance for technology and utilize it not just for the sake of technology, but when it can amplify and advance learning.”

Virtual learning also has its place, Hashmi said.

Online education isn’t for everybody, that’s clear, but when you have educators that are prepared to teach online, and… students who are ready to learn online, it can be a very strong and positive application of the technology.”

What’s next

Education leaders said that while the state has made great strides in its public education landscape over the years, some areas still need improvement in terms of funding and readiness.

Rasoul said the basic structure of classrooms has not fundamentally changed since the industrial age.

“In general, I believe that the way we have structured public education largely is built for the industrial age and is not structured and conducive to the way public education needs to be in moving forward,” Rasoul said.

He added that Virginia has asked schools to do more, including supporting students with their mental health and socio-emotional well being, all the while preparing students and themselves for the workforce changes in the future.

Hanover County Public Schools created calming rooms, which are spaces designed to relieve stress and anxiety for students, during its in-house mental health pilot program that started earlier this year. (Photo courtesy of Hanover County Public Schools)

“I don’t think that we have given the emotional and resiliency and the adaptability skills to students and adults alike to deal with the disruption that is coming,” Rasoul said.

Virginia’s K–12 funding formula is over 50 years old and outdated, Hashmi said, and called on lawmakers to continue their work to modernize it and target more resources to high-need student groups: economically disadvantaged students, English learners and students with disabilities.

The formula determines how much the state must allocate to school districts using staffing ratios rather than student need, Hashmi said, which puts some areas of the state and its students at a disadvantage.

“The huge disparities that we have in educational opportunities because of our outdated funding formula are causing a great deal of hardship in our rural counties,” Hashmi said.

Cherry countered that there is a disconnect between rising funding and declining outcomes, and challenged his colleagues to consider a new plan if something is not working.

“When we look at education in Virginia today, we’re investing a record level of funding, (and) our outcomes are getting worse,” Cherry said. “I think we as legislators need to look at what’s working, what’s not, and whether we are willing to admit what isn’t working and be willing to change those things.”

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

SUBSCRIBE

June 15, 2026